Poster's that show mis-leading information

On ATA scores of different events, to show there is a problem, The numbers of the shooters that posted the same 100, 99, 98. So we have 5 shooters w/1oo in 1970 in an event, but in 2014 we have 90 w/100 in the same event. It was attributed to the easier targets/narrower angles.

Now we see the problem of what has happened.

These are the type of statistics we need see, not just the 100
This is the statistics NW is giving, very mis-leading, just plain BS

NW is the Absolute Leader Doing This Where Ever He Posts, His graphs and Charts, have no back up numbers, to back up his anologies.
When he is questioned, he deletes his threads, and hides behind the false information.
Calling any one at their home and threatening to sue them is grounds for removal from the ATA for life.
Gary Bryant Dr.longshot

 

You insult everyone by not giving them credit to evaluate what others say.

If you declare yourself the winner .... try not to be a 'sore-winner' ....

 

In my opinion, the only winner ther was Hap, who defended his honor and credibility.

NW effectively argued what he wrote was taken wrong, though his credibility is hurt for sure.

DLS demonstrated his low reading comprehension and tunnel vision.

And for the record, I support harder targets.

 

User1: you have the right sign in name USER. It is when someone goes in and evaluates what is said like JHUNTS has had to do, He has my sincere thoughts and Kudoos for taking the time and researching the supplied information, then going to the source and comparing, that gets the correct information. JHUNTS and Kenny Ray thank you both for your uending efforts.
Gary Bryant, Dr.longshot

 

Punctuation man, punctuation. Please try to use basic punctuation if you hope to be better understood.

 

Doc .... do yourself a BIG favor .... Only post when you are getting help from those who are feeding you things to post.

When you try it alone .... it isn't pretty.