HistoryBuff Responds to Neil Winston's Request (history ATA narrowing targets)

The refusal for the EC to sign (CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WAS IN ATA MINUTES) no false information was provided only facts in the ATA minutes, I quoted dates, and line # in the minutes for facts.
DLS

 

I didn't say anything about "false information", not sure how you misconstrued that. Question remains the same though, what "Sparta purchase" is being discussed?

 

Bat read the minutes I posted, I am not doing your research, I stated the year, month, and lines of reference for everyone
so you have first hand information.

DLS

 

While your writing style makes it difficult to follow, I was able to find what I believe you were referencing. As I thought, the answer to my question above is that "... on the Sparta Purchase" was your choice of words, not the ATA's. The fact is the EC seemed to be considering a confidentiality agreement on the relocation efforts, but eventually the same EC decided against it. So no, they did not hide something from us.

 

It is a secrecy agreement,I found out on google search

DLS

 

The good old days, I remember them well.